• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Signup for Emails
  • What You Can Do
  • About True Dignity
    • About the Board
    • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Report Abuse

True Dignity

Citizens Against Assisted Suicide

Ad example

Suicide is never death with dignity, and assisted suicide legislation threatens true patient choices at the end of life.

ACTION ALERT

January 11, 2022 by carolyn

We just got this email from VT Right to Life. Looks like the VT Senate is going to take up a bill (S.74) lifting virtually all restrictions on physician assisted suicide, restrictions that were much touted as safety guarantees when physician assisted suicide was legalized in 2013. It is ironic that the legislature, meeting and voting via Zoom, may pass a bill that allows a doctor to prescribe an overdose of drugs intended to allow a sick person to commit suicide after meeting with that person only via Zoom. No physical examination will be required. No waiting period will be required. Please contact your senators and representatives asking them to vote NO on this bill and to oppose its ever getting out of committee. This isn’t inevitable. While a similar bill was passed in California, dedicated citizens were able to stop one in Washington.
———————————————————
Action Alert: CALL YOUR SENATORS
S.74
Senate Health and Welfare is Minimizing Requirements for Assisted Suicide

We just got this email from VT Right to Life. Looks like the VT Senate is going to take up a bill (S.74) lifting virtually all restrictions on physician assisted suicide, restrictions that were much touted as safety guarantees when physician assisted suicide was legalized in 2013. It is ironic that the legislature, meeting and voting via Zoom, may pass a bill that allows a doctor to prescribe an overdose of drugs intended to allow a sick person to commit suicide after meeting with that person only via Zoom. No physical examination will be required. No waiting period will be required. Please contact your senators and representatives asking them to vote NO on this bill and to oppose its ever getting out of committee. This isn’t inevitable. While a similar bill was passed in California, dedicated citizens were able to stop one in Washington.
———————————————————
Action Alert: CALL YOUR SENATORS
S.74
Senate Health and Welfare is
Minimizing Requirements
for Assisted Suicide

On January 6th, just two days into the 2022 Legislative Session, after voting to work remotely again for at least the first two weeks, your Vermont Senate Health and Welfare took up the issue of lessening restrictions for assisted suicide.
S.74 is a bill that was introduced by Senators McCormack, Clarkson, Lyons, and Sirotkin in 2021. It’s sole purpose is to lessen restrictions on Act 39, Vermont’s assisted suicide bill that was put into law in 2013. These restrictions would be weakened in the following manner:
1. It would eliminate the need for a patient to be in the physical presence of a doctor when both oral requests are made requesting medication to be “self-administered to hasten the patient’s death.” Committee discussions are currently around the issue of requiring audio only (by phone) or audio/video requests.
2. It would eliminate a requirement that “the prescribing physician have conducted a physical examination of the patient in order to determine that the patient was suffering a terminal condition.”
3. It would eliminate a requirement that “the physician must have waited at least 48 hours after the occurrence of the required events before writing the prescription” for this self-administered medication that would hasten the patient’s death.
4. This bill would also “provide immunity for any person who acts in good faith compliance with the provisions of Vermont’s patient choice at end of life laws.”
While it is challenging to think that any legislation can be done effectively through Zoom, without sufficient accessibility from Vermont residents and/or lobbyists, it is even more challenging to imagine that Senate Health and Welfare considers the era of COVID an appropriate time to lessen restrictions on assisted suicide that were put in place to protect the most vulnerable sick and elderly in our population.
Vermont Right to Life’s Executive Director, Mary Hahn Beerworth, will be testifying in opposition to S.74 on Wednesday, January 12th at 9AM. If you would like to listen to her testimony, click here for Livestream access.
VRLC strong opposes this action.
We urge you to please contact your Senators
and House Representatives
and tell them to
VOTE NO on S.74.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Stay Active!

  • Get Action Alerts Emails
  • Make Calls
  • Write Letters

Vermont Government

  • Governor Phil Scott
  • Lt. Governor David Zuckerman
  • State Reps By District
  • State Senators By District
  • VT Legislative Directory

Stay Informed!

  • Join our email list

More to See

(no title)

January 16, 2011 By Administrators

PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”

February 28, 2022 By Administrators

ACTION ALERT

January 11, 2022 By carolyn

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Article Categories

  • Ablism (2)
  • Acceptance of Unintended Consequences (5)
  • Action Alert (3)
  • Administrative (4)
  • Agism (4)
  • Alerts (24)
  • Animal euthanasia argument (4)
  • Board (1)
  • Brittany Maynard (1)
  • California (4)
  • Canada (3)
  • Canada Supreme Court (1)
  • Cheapness of Assisted Suicide (5)
  • Choice Becomes "Duty" to Die (14)
  • Chronic Diseases Rendered Terminal by Non-treatment (3)
  • Classism and Assisted Suicide (4)
  • Colorado (2)
  • Commentary (27)
  • Compassion and Choices (7)
  • Conflict of Interest (4)
  • Connecticut (6)
  • Conscience Rights (2)
  • Cost Cutting Agenda of Barbara Coombs Lee (2)
  • Countering the PAS lobby (1)
  • Court rulings (1)
  • CT (1)
  • Damage to Family (3)
  • Damage to Helpers (1)
  • Death with Dignity (3)
  • Defeats in other states (10)
  • Depression (8)
  • Devaluation of Lives with Disabilities (32)
  • Disability Rights Groups' Opposition (30)
  • Doctor's Power (3)
  • Dying with Real Dignity (1)
  • Editorials (5)
  • Elder Abuse (25)
  • Election 2014 (3)
  • Error Possibility (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Contagion (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Two Sides of the Same Coin (8)
  • Exemption options (4)
  • Expansion of Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia (16)
  • Georgia (3)
  • Germany (1)
  • Healthy people helped to commit suicide (2)
  • Language manipulation (3)
  • Legal Opinions (7)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other Countries (3)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other States (10)
  • Legislative Testimony (1)
  • Letters to the Editors of Newspapers (13)
  • Letters to the Legislature (2)
  • Maine (1)
  • Maryland (1)
  • Massachusetts (3)
  • Medical Opinions (18)
  • Medical Power (5)
  • Medical Societies (6)
  • Montana (2)
  • Moratorium (2)
  • Murder Invitation (3)
  • Nevada (1)
  • Never Investigated (1)
  • New Jersey (5)
  • New Mexico (1)
  • New York (4)
  • New York (1)
  • Not a Peaceful Death (5)
  • Oregon (4)
  • Other Countries (3)
  • Other States (11)
  • Out of State/General (10)
  • Palliative Care (7)
  • Personal Stories (6)
  • Pharmacists (6)
  • Polls (4)
  • Pro Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Prognosis Inaccuracy (3)
  • Racism and Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Randy Brock (1)
  • Rationing (3)
  • Reasons to Oppose (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in Other Countries (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in other states (5)
  • Relatives Won't Know (4)
  • Religious "movement" (1)
  • Repeal Effort (4)
  • Richard Doerflinger (1)
  • Selfishness of Proponents (3)
  • Selling of Suicide (7)
  • Silencing Opposition (2)
  • Slippery Slope (23)
  • Suicide Contagion (23)
  • Suicide Increase (10)
  • Suicide Tourism (3)
  • Talking Points (2)
  • Testimony before non-VT legislative bodies (3)
  • Transparency Lack (1)
  • True Dignity (22)
  • Uncategorized (375)
  • Unused Drug Dangers (1)
  • Unworkability if Regulations Attempt to Make AS "Safe" (1)
  • Updates (1)
  • US (1)
  • Vermont (18)
  • Vermont Alliance for Ethical Health Care (5)
  • Vermont Governor (4)
  • Vermont Legislature (61)
  • Videos (24)
  • Vote Count on Passage (4)
  • Vote Results (5)

Footer

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Recent

  • (no title)
  • PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”
  • ACTION ALERT
  • S.74: A step down the slippery slope
  • Vermont’s Second Assisted Suicide Report Does Not Reassure

Search

Copyright © 2025 · True Dignity · Log in