• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Signup for Emails
  • What You Can Do
  • About True Dignity
    • About the Board
    • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Report Abuse

True Dignity

Citizens Against Assisted Suicide

Ad example

Suicide is never death with dignity, and assisted suicide legislation threatens true patient choices at the end of life.

Why Some People’s “Peace of Mind” Does Not Justify Legal Assisted Suicide

February 2, 2015 by Administrators

Assisted suicide should never be legal because some families are like this one: http://medicalfutility.blogspot.com/2015/01/bad-healthcare-surrogates-kill-patient.html.

Though this is not an assisted suicide case, but one of withdrawal of life support and possible killing under the guise of “comfort care”, we don’t have to imagine how a similar scenario would play out with assisted suicide.

We have actually heard from a man who won’t go public but who says his “terminally ill” elderly father’s second wife persuaded him, by saying that having the drugs would give him “peace of mind,  to get and fill a lethal prescription from doctors in Oregon, where he lived.  She then planned a suicide party, at which the old man refused to take the drugs.  A few days later there was another suicide party, and he did die at that one.  After the death, it turned out that the man had changed his will, leaving everything to the second wife, who no doubt “persuaded” him to make the change.  We have only this man’s son’s account, and it may or may not be true.  It was never reported to Oregon authorities, because the man’s other children, did not agree with their brother that it should be.  Reason, however, tells us, that the very lack of any reporting of any case of abuse to the authorities during 17 years of legalization in OR  is suspicious.  There is no law that is never abused.

We tolerate abuse with some laws, because of the good they bring.  The sad truth about assisted suicide is that a case like the one above or like any similar case involving assisted suicide, is that it cannot be fixed.  We cannot bring this man back.  We cannot bring back anyone who was poisoned with assisted suicide drugs.

During the final debate on Act 39 in the Vermont House, we heard then House member Duncan Kilmartin ask member Sandy Haas, who was the floor manager, whether she could show him any protections in the law for a person who had filled the prescription.  Her answer: that person was terminally ill.  That’s all.  Our question, for the people who tell us that many get the drugs for “peace of mind” and never take them, is: “Don’t the terminally ill deserve the same legal protections everyone else has?  Is abuse of the terminally ill permissible?

We  are reading that the VT Senate Health and Welfare Committee will revisit Act 39 in this session, hoping to strike out the sunset provision that leaves assisted suicide completely unregulated after a certain date in 2016, and leaving the current inadequate regulations in place.  These regulations require no determination of competence at the time of death, and no disinterested witnesses.  Shouldn’t any amended law at least required these?  The bill also requires no reports on what happens at the deathbed, so, unless a family chooses to tell us, we know,  and will know,  nothing about how long it took for a person to die and whether there were complications, as there have been in Oregon.  Also should VT doctors be required to tell every “terminally ill” patient that assisted suicide is a legal option, whether the doctor thinks it appropriate or not?  Under a VT law that existed previous to the adoption of Act 39, they are.  We can’t believe Vermont legislators are going to leave us with a law with even fewer protections than those in Oregon.

Make no mistake though.  The Oregon law,though containing more regulations that Vermont’s, is still insufficient.  It also requires no witnesses at the death bed.  It leaves the determination of whether a patient should be referred for a psychiatric evaluation up to a doctor who is usually from Compassion and Choices and has a built in bias towards granting the request.  It requires no consultation with the patient’s family doctor, with whom he has had a long term relationship.  It used to require reporting of the length of time until death and of complications, but it no longer does except when a medical person was at the deathbed, which is occurring less and less often.  This is just a partial list of its inadequacies.

What we need is repeal of the VT law.  Vermonters should demand it.  We should not become complacent because some patients tell us that having the drugs give them “peace of mind”.  They may have great families.  Someone else does not.

Filed Under: Elder Abuse, Vermont Legislature

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Stay Active!

  • Get Action Alerts Emails
  • Make Calls
  • Write Letters

Vermont Government

  • Governor Phil Scott
  • Lt. Governor David Zuckerman
  • State Reps By District
  • State Senators By District
  • VT Legislative Directory

Stay Informed!

  • Join our email list

More to See

(no title)

January 16, 2011 By Administrators

PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”

February 28, 2022 By Administrators

ACTION ALERT

January 11, 2022 By carolyn

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Article Categories

  • Ablism (2)
  • Acceptance of Unintended Consequences (5)
  • Action Alert (3)
  • Administrative (4)
  • Agism (4)
  • Alerts (24)
  • Animal euthanasia argument (4)
  • Board (1)
  • Brittany Maynard (1)
  • California (4)
  • Canada (3)
  • Canada Supreme Court (1)
  • Cheapness of Assisted Suicide (5)
  • Choice Becomes "Duty" to Die (14)
  • Chronic Diseases Rendered Terminal by Non-treatment (3)
  • Classism and Assisted Suicide (4)
  • Colorado (2)
  • Commentary (27)
  • Compassion and Choices (7)
  • Conflict of Interest (4)
  • Connecticut (6)
  • Conscience Rights (2)
  • Cost Cutting Agenda of Barbara Coombs Lee (2)
  • Countering the PAS lobby (1)
  • Court rulings (1)
  • CT (1)
  • Damage to Family (3)
  • Damage to Helpers (1)
  • Death with Dignity (3)
  • Defeats in other states (10)
  • Depression (8)
  • Devaluation of Lives with Disabilities (32)
  • Disability Rights Groups' Opposition (30)
  • Doctor's Power (3)
  • Dying with Real Dignity (1)
  • Editorials (5)
  • Elder Abuse (25)
  • Election 2014 (3)
  • Error Possibility (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Contagion (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Two Sides of the Same Coin (8)
  • Exemption options (4)
  • Expansion of Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia (16)
  • Georgia (3)
  • Germany (1)
  • Healthy people helped to commit suicide (2)
  • Language manipulation (3)
  • Legal Opinions (7)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other Countries (3)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other States (10)
  • Legislative Testimony (1)
  • Letters to the Editors of Newspapers (13)
  • Letters to the Legislature (2)
  • Maine (1)
  • Maryland (1)
  • Massachusetts (3)
  • Medical Opinions (18)
  • Medical Power (5)
  • Medical Societies (6)
  • Montana (2)
  • Moratorium (2)
  • Murder Invitation (3)
  • Nevada (1)
  • Never Investigated (1)
  • New Jersey (5)
  • New Mexico (1)
  • New York (4)
  • New York (1)
  • Not a Peaceful Death (5)
  • Oregon (4)
  • Other Countries (3)
  • Other States (11)
  • Out of State/General (10)
  • Palliative Care (7)
  • Personal Stories (6)
  • Pharmacists (6)
  • Polls (4)
  • Pro Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Prognosis Inaccuracy (3)
  • Racism and Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Randy Brock (1)
  • Rationing (3)
  • Reasons to Oppose (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in Other Countries (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in other states (5)
  • Relatives Won't Know (4)
  • Religious "movement" (1)
  • Repeal Effort (4)
  • Richard Doerflinger (1)
  • Selfishness of Proponents (3)
  • Selling of Suicide (7)
  • Silencing Opposition (2)
  • Slippery Slope (23)
  • Suicide Contagion (23)
  • Suicide Increase (10)
  • Suicide Tourism (3)
  • Talking Points (2)
  • Testimony before non-VT legislative bodies (3)
  • Transparency Lack (1)
  • True Dignity (22)
  • Uncategorized (375)
  • Unused Drug Dangers (1)
  • Unworkability if Regulations Attempt to Make AS "Safe" (1)
  • Updates (1)
  • US (1)
  • Vermont (18)
  • Vermont Alliance for Ethical Health Care (5)
  • Vermont Governor (4)
  • Vermont Legislature (61)
  • Videos (24)
  • Vote Count on Passage (4)
  • Vote Results (5)

Footer

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Recent

  • (no title)
  • PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”
  • ACTION ALERT
  • S.74: A step down the slippery slope
  • Vermont’s Second Assisted Suicide Report Does Not Reassure

Search

Copyright © 2025 · True Dignity · Log in