• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Signup for Emails
  • What You Can Do
  • About True Dignity
    • About the Board
    • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Report Abuse

True Dignity

Citizens Against Assisted Suicide

Ad example

Suicide is never death with dignity, and assisted suicide legislation threatens true patient choices at the end of life.

Assisted Suicide overview by Alex Schadenberg

May 3, 2014 by Administrators

_IMG6956

Last night, Alex Schadenberg (of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition) was the first speaker of conference.
—-
In the US the proponents are pushing Assisted Suicide (AS). In Canada they’re pushing Euthanasia (EU).

EU-Intentionally cause the death of someone.
EU is seen as a form of homicide in US
EU legal in BE-NE-LUX (Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg)

AS-Someone is directly and intentionally INVOLVED in someone else’s death
Usually by Physicians with a lethal dose.

Often they’re the same thing… in AS some can’t take it themselves, so someone else steps in, and its EU.

Someone else is directly causing in your death.

The current Law is that someone else can’t be involved in your death.
The laws are there to protect you in the lowest time of your life

We all go through difficult times of our lives.

Most people who get cancer, have the normal human reaction of depression.

The law protects you in this time.

Vulnerable people- not just People with Disabilities, but every one of us will be vulnerable at some moment in our life.

The other side says it’s about freedom, but when is it freedom when someone else is involved in your death.

Vulnerable because you’re dependent upon others.
Right now we’re all equal under the law. No one can kill you, no one can be involved in your death.

AS laws, give the DR power over your death.

Why would someone ask for suicide? There could be all sorts of reason. I could simply be asking for help!

AS is now legal in 3 states, Oregon 1997, Washington 2008, and Vermont 2013

Oregon passed by plebiscite/voter initiative.
In Washington by voter initiative.
VT passed legislatively in 2013

Groups in Canada and groups in the US claim that Oregon is a Nirvana. Where no abuse happens, but this is not the case.

Some argue that AS is legal in MT but that’s interesting.
Lower court claimed “right to assisted suicide” in MT
Appealed 6-1 vacated that decision, but found that if a DR was prosecuted over AS, they could use the Consent defense.

Last several years there have been bills to try to reverse that. Last year passed in house failed by 4 votes in senate.

NM County decision has been appealed. It’s very unlikely at this point that a DR would do an AS considering it’s ambiguity in NM.

2012 Voter initiative MA 51-49 against AS

2014 spring
NM attn. general appealed
NH massive victory 219-66 Democrat state
CT bill held off
MA bill held off
Being held off in NJ
And GA has tightened law against AS

The other side is working very hard to win these states.

In NETH it was legalized by court
1987 codified in the law how you could commit AS

In the mid 90’s EU was used for psychological pain by Dr. Shabatt, Court decided suffering is suffering therefore it’s OK. But you can’t define psychological pain.
2002 codified in law what has been decided by courts. Limited EU to 12 years old. Courts had already allowed EU for infants with disabilities in the 90s.

Groningen Protocol, codifies what you must do to EU a newborn infant. Approved by DUTCH MED ASSN. And is legal, by lack of prosecutions.

Who are these children? Spinal bifida

The G Protocol is based on 22 infants who had been EU.
The eliminate newborns with disabilities whether they are terminal or not.
Solely based on the concept of possible future pain.

Belgium never had court cases. They legalized in similar way as NETH, but as a FORM of medical treatment.

In Belguim it passed through the palliative care system.
Worldwide, very few places to legalize it.

Australia and Tasmania have fought off efforts.

The other side is organized on a worldwide basis.

In Canada in 2010, the bill for EU was defeated 228-59 in parliament

In CAN AS was approved by a lower court in BC, and that laws against AS were unconstitutional because it was a discrimination against people with disabilities. Because an abled body could kill themselves without help, but a person with disabilities couldn’t kill themselves without assistance. The other part of the decision is that there was no fear of abuses, since it “hasn’t” happened in other countries. (The Oregon Nirvana argument)

This ruling was challenged by the federal government, the BC high court struck it down, and now it’s going to the Supreme Court.

There is no right to Suicide in CAN.

The other side is getting more and more organized, and have money.

But we have people, and we’re very strong together.

We’re at the edge of a precipice.

And no one should be involved in killing another person.

There was a study in BE saying that they weren’t following the law, but that following the law is an UTOPIAN ideal.

We don’t have tons of money but we have people.

 

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Stay Active!

  • Get Action Alerts Emails
  • Make Calls
  • Write Letters

Vermont Government

  • Governor Phil Scott
  • Lt. Governor David Zuckerman
  • State Reps By District
  • State Senators By District
  • VT Legislative Directory

Stay Informed!

  • Join our email list

More to See

(no title)

January 16, 2011 By Administrators

PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”

February 28, 2022 By Administrators

ACTION ALERT

January 11, 2022 By carolyn

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Article Categories

  • Ablism (2)
  • Acceptance of Unintended Consequences (5)
  • Action Alert (3)
  • Administrative (4)
  • Agism (4)
  • Alerts (24)
  • Animal euthanasia argument (4)
  • Board (1)
  • Brittany Maynard (1)
  • California (4)
  • Canada (3)
  • Canada Supreme Court (1)
  • Cheapness of Assisted Suicide (5)
  • Choice Becomes "Duty" to Die (14)
  • Chronic Diseases Rendered Terminal by Non-treatment (3)
  • Classism and Assisted Suicide (4)
  • Colorado (2)
  • Commentary (27)
  • Compassion and Choices (7)
  • Conflict of Interest (4)
  • Connecticut (6)
  • Conscience Rights (2)
  • Cost Cutting Agenda of Barbara Coombs Lee (2)
  • Countering the PAS lobby (1)
  • Court rulings (1)
  • CT (1)
  • Damage to Family (3)
  • Damage to Helpers (1)
  • Death with Dignity (3)
  • Defeats in other states (10)
  • Depression (8)
  • Devaluation of Lives with Disabilities (32)
  • Disability Rights Groups' Opposition (30)
  • Doctor's Power (3)
  • Dying with Real Dignity (1)
  • Editorials (5)
  • Elder Abuse (25)
  • Election 2014 (3)
  • Error Possibility (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Contagion (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Two Sides of the Same Coin (8)
  • Exemption options (4)
  • Expansion of Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia (16)
  • Georgia (3)
  • Germany (1)
  • Healthy people helped to commit suicide (2)
  • Language manipulation (3)
  • Legal Opinions (7)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other Countries (3)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other States (10)
  • Legislative Testimony (1)
  • Letters to the Editors of Newspapers (13)
  • Letters to the Legislature (2)
  • Maine (1)
  • Maryland (1)
  • Massachusetts (3)
  • Medical Opinions (18)
  • Medical Power (5)
  • Medical Societies (6)
  • Montana (2)
  • Moratorium (2)
  • Murder Invitation (3)
  • Nevada (1)
  • Never Investigated (1)
  • New Jersey (5)
  • New Mexico (1)
  • New York (4)
  • New York (1)
  • Not a Peaceful Death (5)
  • Oregon (4)
  • Other Countries (3)
  • Other States (11)
  • Out of State/General (10)
  • Palliative Care (7)
  • Personal Stories (6)
  • Pharmacists (6)
  • Polls (4)
  • Pro Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Prognosis Inaccuracy (3)
  • Racism and Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Randy Brock (1)
  • Rationing (3)
  • Reasons to Oppose (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in Other Countries (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in other states (5)
  • Relatives Won't Know (4)
  • Religious "movement" (1)
  • Repeal Effort (4)
  • Richard Doerflinger (1)
  • Selfishness of Proponents (3)
  • Selling of Suicide (7)
  • Silencing Opposition (2)
  • Slippery Slope (23)
  • Suicide Contagion (23)
  • Suicide Increase (10)
  • Suicide Tourism (3)
  • Talking Points (2)
  • Testimony before non-VT legislative bodies (3)
  • Transparency Lack (1)
  • True Dignity (22)
  • Uncategorized (375)
  • Unused Drug Dangers (1)
  • Unworkability if Regulations Attempt to Make AS "Safe" (1)
  • Updates (1)
  • US (1)
  • Vermont (18)
  • Vermont Alliance for Ethical Health Care (5)
  • Vermont Governor (4)
  • Vermont Legislature (61)
  • Videos (24)
  • Vote Count on Passage (4)
  • Vote Results (5)

Footer

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Recent

  • (no title)
  • PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”
  • ACTION ALERT
  • S.74: A step down the slippery slope
  • Vermont’s Second Assisted Suicide Report Does Not Reassure

Search

Copyright © 2025 · True Dignity · Log in