• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Signup for Emails
  • What You Can Do
  • About True Dignity
    • About the Board
    • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Report Abuse

True Dignity

Citizens Against Assisted Suicide

Ad example

Suicide is never death with dignity, and assisted suicide legislation threatens true patient choices at the end of life.

Letter to the Bennington Banner: Support Senator Sears on this issue (Killing Assisted Suicide)

March 26, 2012 by Administrators

The letter below was published in today’s Bennington Banner. We agree wholeheartedly with its call to support Senator Sears.

True Dignity does not, however,  support the letter-writer’s call for a referendum on assisted suicide. That would set off a year of ferocious campaigning on an issue that a May 2011 Gallup’s 2011 Values and Beliefs poll found to be “the most controversial cultural issue” in the US (http://www.gallup.com/poll/147842/doctor-assisted-suicide-moral-issue-dividing-americans.aspx). Tons of money and time would be wasted. Vermonters can make their opposition loud and clear at the polls in November and at campaign events before the elections. We should tell those legislators supporting assisted suicide that they must change if they want to be reelected. We should support legislators who have opposed the bill, like Bennington Democratic senators Dick Sears and Bob Hartwell, Bennington Republican house member Mary Morrissey, and Arlington Democratic house member Cynthia Browning. We should ask legislators who have kept their position on assisted suicide secret to make it public so that their constituents go to the polls with complete information on the candidates. We should urge new candidates to declare their opposition to the bill and tell them we will keep their position on assisted suicide in mind in making voting decisions.

True Dignity agrees with the author of this letter that it would be dangerous, if assisted suicide were unfortunately to become legal, to allow just any person over the age of 18 to act as a witness to the competence of a person requesting a lethal dose of barbiturates. We disagree, however, that witnesses should be family members or anyone else close to the patient.  These are the very people who might want the patient dead sooner rather than later, for financial or a host of other reasons.  Abuse of vulnerable people by family members, caregivers, newly found friends, etc. is an all too familiar phenomenon in Vermont and elsewhere. Disability Rights groups have sued the state of Vermont because of its long delays in investigating cases of such abuse (http://vtdigger.org/2011/12/15/groups-sue-state-for-failing-to-investigate-hundreds-of-cases-of-alleged-abuse-and-neglect-of-disabled-and-elderly-vermonters/). Amazingly, the state is fighting the suit instead of fixing the problem (http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2012/03/19/court_asked_to_dismiss_abuse_suit_against_vt/).

True Dignity Vermont believes, along with the letter-writer, that  S. 103 and H. 274 are terrible bills, with all kinds of potential for abuse. The bottom line, however, is that we don’t believe any tinkering can fix legislation that makes assisted suicide legal. Legal assisted suicide is inherantly pressuring. There is no possible way to make it safe.

Here, in italics, is the letter, whch can also be read at http://www.benningtonbanner.com/opinion/ci_20254998/letter-support-senator-sears-this-issue.

Monday March 26, 2012


 I commend Senator Dick Sears for his continuing opposition to bill S.103 proposing physician-assisted suicide and his work to keep the bill from getting to the Senate floor for a vote. As a result he is getting tremendous pressure from fellow Democrats and Governor Shumlin. He is also getting letters from around the country supporting the physician assisted suicide bill. Those of us who oppose the bill should write Sen. Sears encouraging him to maintain his resistance against the bill thus preventing it from becoming law.


 I was in Montpelier last week, March 14, when the bill was before the committee to hear witnesses for and against the bill. While there I noticed the number of people wearing stickers opposing the bill outnumbered, by at least 4 to 1, those wearing stickers supporting the bill. This bill should be put on a referendum so the people of Vermont could decide, but this won’t happen because the proponents of the bill know it would be defeated.


 I have read this bill and it is totally ridiculous. I would be ashamed to have my name associated with it. I found at least two dozen statements or requirements, which were inadequate and indefensible. I will point out only one. One paragraph requires that at least two people witness the signing and dating of the written request for medication by the patient.  The only requirement for the witnesses is that they be at least 18 years of age. There are no other requirements, so these persons could be drug dealers, under the influence of drugs or alcohol, convicted criminals, etc. It seems they can be anybody except someone who might know about the mental condition of the patient like a spouse, relative, friend, person associated with a health care facility, guardian, lawyer, etc.


As I said, there are many ridiculous statements in this bill, but don’t take my word for it, read the bill yourself.


 I pray Sen. Dick Sears continues to resist any kind of legalized suicide bill, amendment to another bill or any other process that could be used by proponents.


 DONALD NOLAN
Pownal

Filed Under: Commentary, Letters to the Editors of Newspapers, True Dignity, Vermont

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Stay Active!

  • Get Action Alerts Emails
  • Make Calls
  • Write Letters

Vermont Government

  • Governor Phil Scott
  • Lt. Governor David Zuckerman
  • State Reps By District
  • State Senators By District
  • VT Legislative Directory

Stay Informed!

  • Join our email list

More to See

(no title)

January 16, 2011 By Administrators

PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”

February 28, 2022 By Administrators

ACTION ALERT

January 11, 2022 By carolyn

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Article Categories

  • Ablism (2)
  • Acceptance of Unintended Consequences (5)
  • Action Alert (3)
  • Administrative (4)
  • Agism (4)
  • Alerts (24)
  • Animal euthanasia argument (4)
  • Board (1)
  • Brittany Maynard (1)
  • California (4)
  • Canada (3)
  • Canada Supreme Court (1)
  • Cheapness of Assisted Suicide (5)
  • Choice Becomes "Duty" to Die (14)
  • Chronic Diseases Rendered Terminal by Non-treatment (3)
  • Classism and Assisted Suicide (4)
  • Colorado (2)
  • Commentary (27)
  • Compassion and Choices (7)
  • Conflict of Interest (4)
  • Connecticut (6)
  • Conscience Rights (2)
  • Cost Cutting Agenda of Barbara Coombs Lee (2)
  • Countering the PAS lobby (1)
  • Court rulings (1)
  • CT (1)
  • Damage to Family (3)
  • Damage to Helpers (1)
  • Death with Dignity (3)
  • Defeats in other states (10)
  • Depression (8)
  • Devaluation of Lives with Disabilities (32)
  • Disability Rights Groups' Opposition (30)
  • Doctor's Power (3)
  • Dying with Real Dignity (1)
  • Editorials (5)
  • Elder Abuse (25)
  • Election 2014 (3)
  • Error Possibility (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Contagion (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Two Sides of the Same Coin (8)
  • Exemption options (4)
  • Expansion of Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia (16)
  • Georgia (3)
  • Germany (1)
  • Healthy people helped to commit suicide (2)
  • Language manipulation (3)
  • Legal Opinions (7)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other Countries (3)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other States (10)
  • Legislative Testimony (1)
  • Letters to the Editors of Newspapers (13)
  • Letters to the Legislature (2)
  • Maine (1)
  • Maryland (1)
  • Massachusetts (3)
  • Medical Opinions (18)
  • Medical Power (5)
  • Medical Societies (6)
  • Montana (2)
  • Moratorium (2)
  • Murder Invitation (3)
  • Nevada (1)
  • Never Investigated (1)
  • New Jersey (5)
  • New Mexico (1)
  • New York (4)
  • New York (1)
  • Not a Peaceful Death (5)
  • Oregon (4)
  • Other Countries (3)
  • Other States (11)
  • Out of State/General (10)
  • Palliative Care (7)
  • Personal Stories (6)
  • Pharmacists (6)
  • Polls (4)
  • Pro Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Prognosis Inaccuracy (3)
  • Racism and Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Randy Brock (1)
  • Rationing (3)
  • Reasons to Oppose (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in Other Countries (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in other states (5)
  • Relatives Won't Know (4)
  • Religious "movement" (1)
  • Repeal Effort (4)
  • Richard Doerflinger (1)
  • Selfishness of Proponents (3)
  • Selling of Suicide (7)
  • Silencing Opposition (2)
  • Slippery Slope (23)
  • Suicide Contagion (23)
  • Suicide Increase (10)
  • Suicide Tourism (3)
  • Talking Points (2)
  • Testimony before non-VT legislative bodies (3)
  • Transparency Lack (1)
  • True Dignity (22)
  • Uncategorized (375)
  • Unused Drug Dangers (1)
  • Unworkability if Regulations Attempt to Make AS "Safe" (1)
  • Updates (1)
  • US (1)
  • Vermont (18)
  • Vermont Alliance for Ethical Health Care (5)
  • Vermont Governor (4)
  • Vermont Legislature (61)
  • Videos (24)
  • Vote Count on Passage (4)
  • Vote Results (5)

Footer

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Recent

  • (no title)
  • PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”
  • ACTION ALERT
  • S.74: A step down the slippery slope
  • Vermont’s Second Assisted Suicide Report Does Not Reassure

Search

Copyright © 2025 · True Dignity · Log in