• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Signup for Emails
  • What You Can Do
  • About True Dignity
    • About the Board
    • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Report Abuse

True Dignity

Citizens Against Assisted Suicide

Ad example

Suicide is never death with dignity, and assisted suicide legislation threatens true patient choices at the end of life.

Our Site is Back, so Here’s a Cautiously Optimistic Report on Today’s Hearings in Health and Welfare

January 30, 2013 by Administrators

True Dignity board members spent the morning listening to testimony before the Senate Health and Welfare Committee.   There were five witnesses, three in favor of assisted suicide and two opposed.

George Eighmey, the assisted suicide activist from Oregon who  has been in Vermont numerous times to tell us that the Oregon assisted suicide law has worked absolutely perfectly, without a single case of abuse or failure, was countered by  Oregon physician Charles Bentz, some of whose positions were then attacked by  Ann Jackson, former executive director of the Oregon Hospice Association.  Jackson claimed, for example, that there is no need for psychiatric evaluations to insure patients’ competency, because any incompetency or treatable mental illness would be picked up by hospice social workers.  In the end, she and some of the committee members dismissed depression as a disqualifier for assisted suicide.  Ms. Jackson also asserted that it is fine for a person with an illness like diabetes that is only terminal if he stops taking his medication, to do that and not only be admitted to hospice but also be assisted in suicide.

Dr. Bentz  began his testimony by  telling the committee how he referred a man with cancer to an oncologist who noted that he was depressed but nevertheless asked Dr. Bentz to be the second physician to concur in his request for assisted suicide.  Dr. Bentz refused, believing that he should receive treatment for his depression.  The oncologist, however, found another doctor to concur, and this depressed man received and used the lethal dose.   Dr. Bentz stated that the existence of legal assisted suicide in this case not only destroyed the doctor/patient relationship, since he, the man’s primary care doctor, was overruled by two doctors who hardly knew him, but it also destroyed the doctor/doctor relationship, since he will never again refer a terminally ill person to this oncologist. He also said that George Eighmey, the activist, was involved, calling his medical practice unsuccessfully to recruit one of his partners to be the concurring doctor.   According to Dr. Bentz, Oregon has crossed the bright line that separates healing and caring from medical killing, a line that no state should ever cross.  The Oregon experience, he stated, has not been the perfect one described by George Eighmey, but has been fraught with problems like those in the case he described.

Paul Harrington, the executive director of the Vermont Medical Society, testified about that group’s opposition to the legislature’s becoming involved at all in the doctor/patient relationship.  The society took this position in 2003 through a vote of all its members and re-affirmed it in 2011 by means of a poll of VT doctors.  The majority of Vermont doctors do not want laws giving patients the right to request assistance in suicide from them; they are opposed to intentional medical killing, which is what assisted suicide is.  They strongly support good palliative care, even if it unintentionally hastens death.   They do not believe it is possible to write a law that adequately addresses their concerns.

The Health and Welfare Committee is composed entirely of supporters of assisted suicide who have co-sponsored all the attempts to legalize it over the past few years in Vermont.   Dr. Bentz succeeded, however, in getting them to say they would examine and address the issues he raised.  As Dr. Bentz told them, there is no way to eliminate the problems arising from allowing medical killing.

There is another hearing tomorrow.   This one will be a joint hearing with the Judiciary Committee.  The witnesses who are opposed will be Ira Byock MD, Director of Palliative Care at Dartmouth Hitchcock, Harvey Reich MD, a Rutland critical care specialist, and Edward Mahoney PhD, a bioethicist who is director of the Center for Faith and Culture at St. Michael’s College.  Those testifying in favor of assisted suicide will be Diana Barnard MD, a palliative care and hospice specialist from Middlebury, Jean Mallary, whose husband, a former US congressman from Vermont who suffered from cancer, committed suicide last year, and medical ethicist Margaret Battin from the University of Utah.  It promises to be a long day.

Oh, we forgot to say that Dr. Harry Chen, the State Health Commissioner, testified in favor of assisted suicide on behalf of Governor Shumlin.   If Randy Brock, who ran against him in the last election, had been elected, we wouldn’t be having this discussion in our state house again.  Our votes count.  The election is over, but now our voices count.  We are the only ones who can stop this, and we will.

 

Filed Under: Vermont Legislature

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Stay Active!

  • Get Action Alerts Emails
  • Make Calls
  • Write Letters

Vermont Government

  • Governor Phil Scott
  • Lt. Governor David Zuckerman
  • State Reps By District
  • State Senators By District
  • VT Legislative Directory

Stay Informed!

  • Join our email list

More to See

(no title)

January 16, 2011 By Administrators

PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”

February 28, 2022 By Administrators

ACTION ALERT

January 11, 2022 By carolyn

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Article Categories

  • Ablism (2)
  • Acceptance of Unintended Consequences (5)
  • Action Alert (3)
  • Administrative (4)
  • Agism (4)
  • Alerts (24)
  • Animal euthanasia argument (4)
  • Board (1)
  • Brittany Maynard (1)
  • California (4)
  • Canada (3)
  • Canada Supreme Court (1)
  • Cheapness of Assisted Suicide (5)
  • Choice Becomes "Duty" to Die (14)
  • Chronic Diseases Rendered Terminal by Non-treatment (3)
  • Classism and Assisted Suicide (4)
  • Colorado (2)
  • Commentary (27)
  • Compassion and Choices (7)
  • Conflict of Interest (4)
  • Connecticut (6)
  • Conscience Rights (2)
  • Cost Cutting Agenda of Barbara Coombs Lee (2)
  • Countering the PAS lobby (1)
  • Court rulings (1)
  • CT (1)
  • Damage to Family (3)
  • Damage to Helpers (1)
  • Death with Dignity (3)
  • Defeats in other states (10)
  • Depression (8)
  • Devaluation of Lives with Disabilities (32)
  • Disability Rights Groups' Opposition (30)
  • Doctor's Power (3)
  • Dying with Real Dignity (1)
  • Editorials (5)
  • Elder Abuse (25)
  • Election 2014 (3)
  • Error Possibility (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Contagion (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Two Sides of the Same Coin (8)
  • Exemption options (4)
  • Expansion of Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia (16)
  • Georgia (3)
  • Germany (1)
  • Healthy people helped to commit suicide (2)
  • Language manipulation (3)
  • Legal Opinions (7)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other Countries (3)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other States (10)
  • Legislative Testimony (1)
  • Letters to the Editors of Newspapers (13)
  • Letters to the Legislature (2)
  • Maine (1)
  • Maryland (1)
  • Massachusetts (3)
  • Medical Opinions (18)
  • Medical Power (5)
  • Medical Societies (6)
  • Montana (2)
  • Moratorium (2)
  • Murder Invitation (3)
  • Nevada (1)
  • Never Investigated (1)
  • New Jersey (5)
  • New Mexico (1)
  • New York (4)
  • New York (1)
  • Not a Peaceful Death (5)
  • Oregon (4)
  • Other Countries (3)
  • Other States (11)
  • Out of State/General (10)
  • Palliative Care (7)
  • Personal Stories (6)
  • Pharmacists (6)
  • Polls (4)
  • Pro Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Prognosis Inaccuracy (3)
  • Racism and Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Randy Brock (1)
  • Rationing (3)
  • Reasons to Oppose (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in Other Countries (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in other states (5)
  • Relatives Won't Know (4)
  • Religious "movement" (1)
  • Repeal Effort (4)
  • Richard Doerflinger (1)
  • Selfishness of Proponents (3)
  • Selling of Suicide (7)
  • Silencing Opposition (2)
  • Slippery Slope (23)
  • Suicide Contagion (23)
  • Suicide Increase (10)
  • Suicide Tourism (3)
  • Talking Points (2)
  • Testimony before non-VT legislative bodies (3)
  • Transparency Lack (1)
  • True Dignity (22)
  • Uncategorized (375)
  • Unused Drug Dangers (1)
  • Unworkability if Regulations Attempt to Make AS "Safe" (1)
  • Updates (1)
  • US (1)
  • Vermont (18)
  • Vermont Alliance for Ethical Health Care (5)
  • Vermont Governor (4)
  • Vermont Legislature (61)
  • Videos (24)
  • Vote Count on Passage (4)
  • Vote Results (5)

Footer

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Recent

  • (no title)
  • PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”
  • ACTION ALERT
  • S.74: A step down the slippery slope
  • Vermont’s Second Assisted Suicide Report Does Not Reassure

Search

Copyright © 2025 · True Dignity · Log in