• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Videos
  • Signup for Emails
  • What You Can Do
  • About True Dignity
    • About the Board
    • Contact Us
  • Links
  • Report Abuse

True Dignity

Citizens Against Assisted Suicide

Ad example

Suicide is never death with dignity, and assisted suicide legislation threatens true patient choices at the end of life.

Remove the Euphemism And Assisted Suicide Is Homicide: Commentary from the Toronto Star

June 19, 2012 by Administrators

http://www.thestar.com/printarticle/1212771

From the online site of the Toronto Star

DiManno: B.C. assisted suicide ruling an alarming interpretation of Charter

June 18, 2012

Rosie DiManno

Remove the euphemism and assisted suicide is homicide.

Justifiable?

B.C. Supreme Court Justice Lynn Smith thinks so, with an alarming landmark interpretation of the Canadian Charter that would allow the extinguishing of lives — sentient lives, not a non-person fetus in the womb. Section 15, which guarantees equality, discriminates against people with severe disabilities, Smith concluded in the decision released Friday, because those afflicted with such limitations are unable to kill themselves unless somebody else provides a helpful hand: injection, drugs, and why not a pillow over the mouth or a gentle push off the ledge of a very tall building?

They only take up space, after all, the acutely infirm and frail elderly, the forever institutionalized in their long-term hospital beds and just-existing facilities; such a burden on families and society. And some — like Gloria Taylor, the woman contending with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who was a plaintiff in the court challenge — apparently see themselves as no more than the sum part of their disabilities, unable to go on at some point, seeking an abetted release from unbearable misery.

But if that’s the image of self, how long before it might become an acceptable view of others?

Open that Pandora’s box of ethical imperatives — what we’ve always believed morally wrong, murder most paramount — and absolute prohibition disappears. It doesn’t take a Margaret Atwood or Kazuo Ishiguro to imagine a dystopian future where the most vulnerable among us might be deemed expendable, with death a construct of convenience.

Who judges the quality of mercy in mercy killings? The Netherlands, first among nations to slide from assisted suicide to legal euthanasia (in 2001), assured that sedative dosages would be permitted only under rigorously monitored conditions and narrowly to adult patients suffering “great pain with no hope of relief’’ who had demonstrated “informed consent.’’ But Dutch hospitals have admitted to euthanizing babies deemed to be in tremendous pain from incurable disease or born with extreme deformities. There are those, including doctors, who’ve advocated euthanasia for the severely mentally retarded — individuals who clearly can’t form consent.

The slippery slope isn’t an exaggeration; it’s human nature. That’s why absolute prohibition is the standard in all but a handful of jurisdictions that Canada might now join, should this B.C. court ruling either go unchallenged or find concurrence at the Supreme Court of Canada, where the case is undoubtedly headed.

Canada’s top court also has before it the case of a 60-year-old man at Toronto’s Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre who has been in a purportedly vegetative and irreversible state since a brain infection in 2010. Two doctors want to pull the plug over the wishes of Hassan Rasouli’s wife and family. Indeed, the physicians reject even the advisory framework of an existing provincial ethics committee that considers such cases and, for that matter, the Health Care Consent Act of Canada, arguing that ending someone’s life is “not treatment’’ as medically understood.

The Ontario Court of Appeal ruled against the doctors last year, ordering the patient be kept alive, “with the assistance of life-support measures’’ until the spouse agrees there is no further hope of recovery. Undaunted, the physicians appealed to the Supreme Court. Clearly, they consider themselves the ultimate arbiters of life and death. They’ve not been remotely chastened by developments suggesting their original diagnosis was wrong anyway since Rasouli, according to his family, has since been able to communicate by making a thumbs-up gesture.

This might all seem a long way from the B.C. case ruling on assisted suicide, but it’s all of a piece: quality of life, who decides, and the lobotomizing refrain of “dying with dignity,’’ as if any of us can be assured of that. Dying with dignity is not a quantifiable entitlement and certainly can’t be enshrined in law. There are no Charter guarantees protecting anybody from a life free of sorrow. Some will die on the spot, felled by a heart attack. Others will endure years of discomfort and anxiety, with all the “indignities’’ that are inflicted by medical procedures and hospitalization.

In her voluminous 140,000 word judgment, the B.C. judge also applied Section 7: the right to life, liberty and security. If I understand it correctly, that would include the liberty to commit suicide, which isn’t illegal in Canada. But Taylor wouldn’t be able to commit suicide unassisted and that has not been legal, as reinforced the last time the Supreme Court visited this issue 19 years ago, by a slender 5-4 decision.

It is radical inside-out rationalizing to turn right to life into right to death, with a tortured reading of the Charter to bless approval of murder in some circumstances. The judge may be an exceptionally wise person with a brilliant legal mind, but she displayed a shockingly poor grasp of some basic premises when challenging a government lawyer’s argument that life is sacrosanct and the state cannot condone the taking of a life.

“But (the state) sends young men off to war,’’ Justice Smith countered.

That is an absurd analogy, seriously undermining Smith’s tall forehead bona fides.

What’s most regrettable in this case, the thing at the dark heart of the matter, is the fundamental Right to Die ethos that a life overwhelmingly restricted, an existence profoundly enfeebled, is a life not worth living. As if Gloria Taylor, a mother and grandmother, will one day — as she presumably believes — when her body is utterly stiffened and unresponsive to her commands, take no joy from the sound of her grandchildren’s voices, or music, or a book read to her, or a movie on TV, or the sun on her face. And if the state agrees that such a life can be legally terminated, with a doctor assisting to hasten death, then how do we reassure the many among us with severe handicaps, physical and mental, that their lives have equal worth to the healthy and hale? It would be a legal and moral contradiction. It would be a lie.

I have no faith in the stipulation that Justice Smith appended: That an attending physician and consulting psychiatrist each attest Gloria Taylor is competent and her request for a physician-assisted death is shown to be voluntary, come the day she decides to end her life. We have seen, in other jurisdictions, how such a caution can be exploited and marginalized. Ours is an era of well-documented elder abuse. Assisted suicide is an invitation to incalculable harm and wrong-doing against the vulnerable.

The judge immediately placed a 12-month suspension on her ruling, allowing Parliament time to write new legislation or for the anticipated appeals by provincial and federal governments to be filed. Taylor was given a legal exemption so that she needn’t await any of that, can go ahead and kill herself, if she chooses, with a doctor assisting who won’t be charged.

This is no longer exclusively about her, however, because all Canadians have a stake in what we can morally abide.

Parliament has already spoken on assisted suicide. But in a country that lives and dies by the Charter, politicians are trumped by judges. Frankly, I trust neither.

There is one other legal remedy to the purported inequality that exists between those capable of killing themselves and those who aren’t: Make suicide illegal for everybody.
It won’t make any difference to those who succeed. Those who survive can argue their case before a judge. I’d like to see the first one to dare convict.

Rosie DiManno usually appears Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday.

Filed Under: Out of State/General

Primary Sidebar

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Stay Active!

  • Get Action Alerts Emails
  • Make Calls
  • Write Letters

Vermont Government

  • Governor Phil Scott
  • Lt. Governor David Zuckerman
  • State Reps By District
  • State Senators By District
  • VT Legislative Directory

Stay Informed!

  • Join our email list

More to See

(no title)

January 16, 2011 By Administrators

PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”

February 28, 2022 By Administrators

ACTION ALERT

January 11, 2022 By carolyn

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Article Categories

  • Ablism (2)
  • Acceptance of Unintended Consequences (5)
  • Action Alert (3)
  • Administrative (4)
  • Agism (4)
  • Alerts (24)
  • Animal euthanasia argument (4)
  • Board (1)
  • Brittany Maynard (1)
  • California (4)
  • Canada (3)
  • Canada Supreme Court (1)
  • Cheapness of Assisted Suicide (5)
  • Choice Becomes "Duty" to Die (14)
  • Chronic Diseases Rendered Terminal by Non-treatment (3)
  • Classism and Assisted Suicide (4)
  • Colorado (2)
  • Commentary (27)
  • Compassion and Choices (7)
  • Conflict of Interest (4)
  • Connecticut (6)
  • Conscience Rights (2)
  • Cost Cutting Agenda of Barbara Coombs Lee (2)
  • Countering the PAS lobby (1)
  • Court rulings (1)
  • CT (1)
  • Damage to Family (3)
  • Damage to Helpers (1)
  • Death with Dignity (3)
  • Defeats in other states (10)
  • Depression (8)
  • Devaluation of Lives with Disabilities (32)
  • Disability Rights Groups' Opposition (30)
  • Doctor's Power (3)
  • Dying with Real Dignity (1)
  • Editorials (5)
  • Elder Abuse (25)
  • Election 2014 (3)
  • Error Possibility (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Contagion (2)
  • Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide Two Sides of the Same Coin (8)
  • Exemption options (4)
  • Expansion of Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia (16)
  • Georgia (3)
  • Germany (1)
  • Healthy people helped to commit suicide (2)
  • Language manipulation (3)
  • Legal Opinions (7)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other Countries (3)
  • Legislative Efforts in Other States (10)
  • Legislative Testimony (1)
  • Letters to the Editors of Newspapers (13)
  • Letters to the Legislature (2)
  • Maine (1)
  • Maryland (1)
  • Massachusetts (3)
  • Medical Opinions (18)
  • Medical Power (5)
  • Medical Societies (6)
  • Montana (2)
  • Moratorium (2)
  • Murder Invitation (3)
  • Nevada (1)
  • Never Investigated (1)
  • New Jersey (5)
  • New Mexico (1)
  • New York (4)
  • New York (1)
  • Not a Peaceful Death (5)
  • Oregon (4)
  • Other Countries (3)
  • Other States (11)
  • Out of State/General (10)
  • Palliative Care (7)
  • Personal Stories (6)
  • Pharmacists (6)
  • Polls (4)
  • Pro Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Prognosis Inaccuracy (3)
  • Racism and Assisted Suicide (1)
  • Randy Brock (1)
  • Rationing (3)
  • Reasons to Oppose (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in Other Countries (3)
  • Rejections of Assisted Suicide in other states (5)
  • Relatives Won't Know (4)
  • Religious "movement" (1)
  • Repeal Effort (4)
  • Richard Doerflinger (1)
  • Selfishness of Proponents (3)
  • Selling of Suicide (7)
  • Silencing Opposition (2)
  • Slippery Slope (23)
  • Suicide Contagion (23)
  • Suicide Increase (10)
  • Suicide Tourism (3)
  • Talking Points (2)
  • Testimony before non-VT legislative bodies (3)
  • Transparency Lack (1)
  • True Dignity (22)
  • Uncategorized (375)
  • Unused Drug Dangers (1)
  • Unworkability if Regulations Attempt to Make AS "Safe" (1)
  • Updates (1)
  • US (1)
  • Vermont (18)
  • Vermont Alliance for Ethical Health Care (5)
  • Vermont Governor (4)
  • Vermont Legislature (61)
  • Videos (24)
  • Vote Count on Passage (4)
  • Vote Results (5)

Footer

Tags

abuse Act 39 Another Defeat for Assisted Suicide coercion Letters to the Editor: Pauline Austin Opponents of Assisted Suicide Greatly Outnumber Proponents at Manchester Forum. S.74 safeguards Story of a person with disabilities opposing assisted suicide telehealth

Recent

  • (no title)
  • PHYSICAL MOVEMENTS OR OTHER EXTERNAL SIGNS OF DISTRESS ARE SOMETIMES EXHIBITED”
  • ACTION ALERT
  • S.74: A step down the slippery slope
  • Vermont’s Second Assisted Suicide Report Does Not Reassure

Search

Copyright © 2025 · True Dignity · Log in